Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Glaxo Dual Pricing case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
Glaxo Dual Pricing case - examine ExampleThe legislation determining the price was used to identify the price of the medicine. The law in Spain allowed for medicate sale at prices determined by Glaxo. Hence, Glaxo sold drugs in Spain at low prices while it brocaded the prices if the drug was to be resold in a country that would buy at a higher price.In 2001 the Commission made a decision which regarded article 81 was applicable to the medicines that were to be sold and thus, they did not warrant exclusion. Glaxos position was that the precise factors that were ongoing at that time in the pharmaceutical transaction were supposed to lead to various evaluation of competition in the perseverance. The precise factors as determined by Glaxo were the impact of replicate sell on medicine consumers, the effect of parallel trade on drug shortages, the effect of price control by European Union member states and the effect of parallel trade on research and development. The attorney genera l rejected these points of view by Glaxo. They were also nullified by the European Court of Justice. It was stated that the pharmaceutical business was not exempt from the criterion of Competition right as all industries were under it. Articles 81(1) and 81(3) were of importance to the case. Glaxo noted the importance of price regulation by countries. The final examination judgements of the case were applicable to all undertakings in spite of their sectors (Rey and Venit, 2009).The European Commission has protected and encouraged parallel trade for prescription medicines under its administrative wing. Also, the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice in likeness to competition laws and free trade of goods has resulted in existence of parallel trade for prescription medicines. The pharmaceutical industry depends on its own profits to finance its objectives, hence a reason of encouragement to partake in parallel trade. According to Rey and Venit (2009), variations exist in E uropean Union member countries in terms of their
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.